Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

So, a district attorney’s PERSONAL views regarding the death penalty can prevent the death penalty, when the death penalty is not forbidden by law?


2 posted on 08/28/2007 7:46:13 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: John Leland 1789

Another San Francisco value.


3 posted on 08/28/2007 7:51:13 AM PDT by SmithL (I don't do Barf Alerts, you're old enough to read and decide for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: John Leland 1789

Yes, it’s called “prosecutorial discretion.”

The check on this is that the DA is (generally) an elected official, and if the local people don’t like his or her stance, they elect a different one.


4 posted on 08/28/2007 7:52:07 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: John Leland 1789
So, a district attorney’s PERSONAL views regarding the death penalty can prevent the death penalty, when the death penalty is not forbidden by law?

Yes because the DA is an elected local official and supposedly reflects the values of the local voters - which may or may not coincide with the values of the state as a whole. Just because state law allows the death penalty doesn't mean prosecutors have to seek it. That is a decision left entirely to them & they can use whatever reasoning they like to make the decision. They have to answer for it at election time.

5 posted on 08/28/2007 7:54:49 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson