[Maelstrom]

Well, logically...using the logic you’ve used and supported in yon chief justice...you haven’t claimed that I seem to be failing in the area of logic.

You’re missing both the words “expressly” and “explicitly”, so clearly, unless you’re wrong, you’ve failed to chastize my logic.

((BTW: This is a catch-22, you should have quit while you were ahead, rather than provided the material that generated this obvious tautology...based of course on your chief justice’s words and as defended by you.))

[Non-Sequitur]

You’re missing both the words “expressly” and “explicitly”, so clearly, unless you’re wrong, you’ve failed to chastize my logic.

Since you haven't offered any logic then I can't say that I've seen it. You said that Chief Justice Marshall was a traitor and wrong and a numbskull and all the rest, apparently because you say so. Yet you haven't pointed out were his logic is flawed. Take his statement and point out exactly where his logic falls apart.