[Non-Sequitur]

His poor grasp of logic proves my case all by itself.

No lack of ego at all in you, is there?

That’s why when I say you’re a numbskull. You really can be offended because I didn’t right that you are EXPRESSLY, a numbskull.

Not at all. You can explicitly call me a numbskull or imply that I'm a numbskull and neither one could possibly offend me because all I have to do is consider the source.

[Maelstrom]

Logic does not require ego.

Most rational people understand that if I call you a numbskull, I’ve called you a numbskull with, or without the word “explicit”.

Now let’s review one idiot’s review of the 10th Amendment.

I will EXPRESSLY state that the argument made that the 10th Amendment lacked that word and that paucity allowed the Chief Justice to justify violating is without merit or logic.

Logic does not require ego.

Justifying the violation of logic on such a flimsy basis requires a vast ego.