Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

A good statement of the conundrum. My view is, however, that it was not a legal question but a political one. Lincoln assumed that the acts of secession were invalid and asserted that he was supressing a rebellion against the governments of the several states. Anything any court might have decided after the Confederate surrender was simply an acceptance of the faits accomplis. Radical reconstruction, however, made hash of Lincoln’s claim by accepting the Confederate argument and then treated the States as conquered territory. Later , of course, there was an attempted retreat to the Lincoln position, but that was a farce.


612 posted on 09/02/2007 1:47:29 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
lincoln ASSUMED nothing. he simply CHOSE war, rather than accept secession & trading with the new dixie republic.

a MILLION Americans died for his egomania & & his lust for POLITICAL/social/financial domination of dixie by the north.

free dixie,sw

614 posted on 09/02/2007 1:55:39 PM PDT by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson