[Non-Sequitur]

given that you posted a "source" in post 588 that is DECEPTIVE at best & an OUTRIGHT LIE at worst, WHY should you be believed about ANY source????

Are you saying that the Constitution does not contain an Article III, Section 2? Or that section does not contain a clause 1 or clause 2? Are you admitting that you haven't the faintest idea of what 'jurisdiction' means? Or are you just demonstrating your general ignorance?

[stand watie]

i'm saying that i believe you knowing tried to DECEIVE your readers on this forum, hoping that NOBODY would bother to check your source.

thus, we must assume that you:

1. have a "reading comprehension problem",

2. are incapable of understanding the question i asked you,

3. are DESPERATELY trying to "change the subject" (because you're smart enough to KNOW that you've "caught your tail in the gate"),

4. that you LIED or

5. all of the above..

which is it??? (could it be that the TRUTHFUL answer is #5????)

free dixie,sw