Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boiler Plate

“OK then, if the north had only the same number of men they still would have won, correct?”

Not based on the kill ratios. The north lost more men per round fired.

“Hoenstly, I only post because it is fun teasing you guys. I’m such a bad person.”

Sorry it didn’t work.


177 posted on 08/28/2007 8:54:38 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Lee'sGhost
LG,
“Not based on the kill ratios. The north lost more men per round fired.”

That doesn’t prove anything. It is like saying Ohio would have beat Florida if Fred Gwinn hadn’t been hurt, because he would have run back every kickoff. However, it is the kind of speculation that sounds an awful like an excuse.

In the end all the “Facts” are just that, and they can’t be changed. When they all got added up, the south lost. BFD. I still don’t understand why it is still a current topic in the south.

Kindest Regards,
Boiler Plate

PS I went to HS with your great great grandson. He is a great guy and a world renown scientist. But you already knew that.

220 posted on 08/28/2007 11:58:09 AM PDT by Boiler Plate ("Whatever is begun in anger, ends in shame." Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson