To: MamaTexan
Oh, good grief. Your not posting that unsubstantiated, unsigned, undated letter in which it was asked it NOT be made public [but was published ANYWAY] by a guy that had been pestering Madison as evidence again, are you? OK, then how about This?
Same letter, only this one is from the online library site for the Writings of James Madison edited by Guillard Hunt and published in 1900. Scroll down towards the bottom and you'll find it there. Is this a better source? Does it meet with your strict qualifications? Do you still think that I'm making it up?
To: Non-Sequitur
Same letter, only this one is from the online library site for the Writings of James Madison edited by Guillard Hunt and published in 1900. Scroll down towards the bottom and you'll find it there. Is this a better source? Does it meet with your strict qualifications? Do you still think that I'm making it up? Sorry. You can't convince me that the recipient of a letter who insists on using a nom de plume [but they supposedly found who it was anyway] had an undated, unsigned letter that specified it not be published [moral turpitude, anyone?] can constitute any kind of evidence.
Besides...did you ever see a Madison correspondence that DID NOT have both a date and a signature?
1,077 posted on
04/24/2009 8:14:58 AM PDT by
MamaTexan
(If you don't think government IS the problem, you're not looking hard enough)
To: Non-Sequitur
1,078 posted on
04/24/2009 8:35:19 AM PDT by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson