Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guess What Folks - Secession Wasn't Treason
The Copperhead Chronicles ^ | August 2007 | Al Benson

Posted on 08/27/2007 1:37:39 PM PDT by BnBlFlag

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,081-1,084 next last
An excellent commentary on the issue of secession.
1 posted on 08/27/2007 1:37:46 PM PDT by BnBlFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Ping


2 posted on 08/27/2007 1:39:58 PM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*RWVA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Dixie Ping!


3 posted on 08/27/2007 1:40:08 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
Well, you see, it's only treasonous if the South does it.

Because only the South actually did it. And their acts of secession, while illegal, weren't necessarily treasonous as the Constitution defines it.

4 posted on 08/27/2007 1:40:21 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericks-burg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And their acts of secession, while illegal ...

Just curious here. For an act to be illegal it has to violate a law. Which law was violated by the Southern States' secession?

5 posted on 08/27/2007 1:44:15 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Don’t you need an Act of Congress to secede?


6 posted on 08/27/2007 1:44:51 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Just curious here. For an act to be illegal it has to violate a law. Which law was violated by the Southern States' secession?

The Constitution. You know that Chief Justice Chase who Benson quoted? Look up what he had to say on the matter. Texas v White, 1869.

7 posted on 08/27/2007 1:46:04 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericks-burg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag

Uh-oh - time to crank up the popcorn machine.


8 posted on 08/27/2007 1:47:27 PM PDT by ladtx ( "I don't know how I got over the hill without getting to the top." - - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Secession is unconstitutional. There is no enacted law prohibiting, but there is little doubt that Congress could enact such a law (though why it would who knows).

There is no provision for leaving the Union. Once the states agreed to join they were stuck for better or worse.


9 posted on 08/27/2007 1:48:38 PM PDT by tdewey10 (Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
Stupid commentary.

Any discussion of secession which analogizes the Confederacy leaving the Union to the US leaving the British Empire is prima facie worthless.

10 posted on 08/27/2007 1:49:20 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
"....It's much more lucrative for them (and it gets more press coverage) if they spend their time and resources attacking Confederate symbols."

That's the real issue. The Black leadership is not serious about fixing the many problems faced in the Black community but enriching themselves and making themselves power brokers with the liberal establishment. Every problem in the Black community is excused with it's the man's fault and that more money should be poured into their special causes to sooth white guilt and make reparations for slavery. When Blacks like Bill Cosby suggest that many of the problems in the Black community are self caused and should be addressed from within they are vilified. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are prime examples of what is wrong and why nothing is getting fixed.

11 posted on 08/27/2007 1:51:36 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10
There is no provision for leaving the Union. Once the states agreed to join they were stuck for better or worse.

I disagree. Since approval of Congress is needed for a state to be admitted or for any change in their status or borders after admission, then by implication there is no reason why a state can't leave with the approval of Congress as well. In his Texas v. White decision, Chief Justice Chase seemed to hold out that possibility.

12 posted on 08/27/2007 1:53:47 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericks-burg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Could they pass one Omnibus Secession Bill? Even if they had a legislative majority and no fear of a Presidential veto, it would be a game of diminishing returns if the states allowed to secede couldn’t vote on the secession of subsequent southern states.
13 posted on 08/27/2007 1:59:05 PM PDT by allmendream (A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal. (Hunter08))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

“Once the states agreed to join they were stuck for better or worse”.
In other words, the U.S. is like the Mafia or MS-13, once you’ve joined you can never leave.
The United States of Hotel California.


14 posted on 08/27/2007 2:00:23 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

“There is no provision for leaving the Union. Once the states agreed to join they were stuck for better or worse.”

The second statement does not follow from the first.

One simplistic but fair reading would be that since there is no provision for leaving the Union, and since all authority not specifically granted to the federal government is retained by the various States, then the States retain the right to leave the Union.


15 posted on 08/27/2007 2:02:07 PM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Could they pass one Omnibus Secession Bill? Even if they had a legislative majority and no fear of a Presidential veto, it would be a game of diminishing returns if the states allowed to secede couldn’t vote on the secession of subsequent southern states.

I hadn't really thought out the mechanics of it, but now that you mention it a single piece of legislation authorizing all 7 state to leave would have had the best chance for success.

16 posted on 08/27/2007 2:02:27 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericks-burg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I propose that Mass. and Vermont be “encouraged” to secede immediatly! Also Oregon, Wshington and Califonia.


17 posted on 08/27/2007 2:03:36 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
One simplistic but fair reading would be that since there is no provision for leaving the Union, and since all authority not specifically granted to the federal government is retained by the various States, then the States retain the right to leave the Union.

States did not have the right to unilaterally join the Union, how could the retain a right to unilaterally leave?

18 posted on 08/27/2007 2:03:55 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericks-burg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: snuffy smiff; slow5poh; EdReform; TheZMan; Texas Mulerider; Oorang; freedomfiter2; ...

Thanks for the ping y’all!


19 posted on 08/27/2007 2:04:25 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And at the time it would have to be veto proof because Lincoln was President; and I don't think he would have signed it.
20 posted on 08/27/2007 2:06:34 PM PDT by allmendream (A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal. (Hunter08))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,081-1,084 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson