[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

every last FReeper knew that all these polls are nothing but a libmedia propaganda tool designed to move public opinion, particularly if the public holds an opinion but not strongly.

Yeah, all of a sudden polls are objective now and are the gospel. Just three years ago FReepers were railing against polls showing Bush in the gutter.

FReepers have been so brainwashed by the establishment who promote politics as usual & party hacks it's beyond pathetic. These are the same folks:

(1) Only Arnold can win in California, McClintock is too conservative

(2) Toomey can't win, Arlen Specter is better than nothing, the incumbent must always be supported.

(3) Chaffee will at least give the GOP control over the Senate committees, so he should be supported.

(4) Katherine Harris can't win, she ain't conservative. Bah!

The fire and passion of conservatism that used to be the hallmark of this website has been replaced by complacency and blind party loyalty.

[George W. Bush]

The fire and passion of conservatism that used to be the hallmark of this website has been replaced by complacency and blind party loyalty.

Great list.

It worries me more when FReepers seem to routinely accept libmedia polls as unbiased and accurate sources instead of the propaganda that they truly are. Just because in the last weeks before an election, they adjust the 'glide path' of the polls so they match up to the voters isn't proof that the polls aren't used as a whip to drive forward the Left's agenda.

[Rytwyng]

1) Only Arnold can win in California, McClintock is too conservative

Polling data indicates that HALF of those who voted for Arnold, thought McClintock was better but "couldn't win". So, do the math: if you take half of Arnold's vote tally, and add McClintock's actual vote tally to it, that was enough to win. In other words, McClintock could've had it.