To: hocndoc
I didn't go to medical school. What's your point? Are only the "anointed" physicians allowed to have an opinion on this topic? Don't look now but the grand jury probably didn't to medical school either, nor will the civil or criminal juries have done so.
Doctors are just going to have to get used to having your decisions reviewed by lesser mortals.
Where did you go to medical school? That's not the first, second, or hundredth time I've asked that question.
The encounter with the hospital administrator and the staff about killing the patients has been reported without contradiction. That "healthy young male doctor" you refer to was a Dr. Barrett IIRC. He left after attending that meeting and refusing to participate. He reported it to the authorities.
Should he have left? I would say no. But he didn't kill any patients, he at least has that going for him.
73 posted on
08/26/2007 2:14:22 PM PDT by
Iwo Jima
("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
To: Iwo Jima
It is a greater sin to abandon a patient than to stay and relieve a patient's suffering. Dr. Barrett should be the one brought up on charges .
To: Iwo Jima
Leaving patients to die is better than injecting them? It’s still a deliberate act that he knew would result in people dying. He could have stayed and refused to participate.
That’s not much different in my book.
142 posted on
08/26/2007 4:59:41 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson