Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iwo Jima

You’ve made some good points, but you missed an important part of the article and you made a factual error.

The article says . . . Brescia wrote in his report that the medical charts showed the patients were “stable, without an immediate or obvious threat of dying.” This is in reference to the patients who died of the morphine/Versed doses. So they weren’t about to die from thier diseases, and they weren’t about to drown because they were on the seventh floor. They died because some of the staff injected them with lethal doses of drugs.

A DNR order, however, is not the bugaboo you’re making it out to be. I’ve dealt with them on a professional level. They are exactly whay they say - no CPR. If a person with a DNR order had a gunshot wound, for example, that person would be sent to surgery as if the order did not exist. The only difference would be if the person went into cardiac arrest, they wouldn’t perform CPR.


215 posted on 08/27/2007 2:45:05 PM PDT by sig226 (New additions to the list of democrat criminals - see my profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: sig226
Yes, that is what a DNR order should be. But one poster was saying that DNR meant comfort care only, and that's not right.

I know that some medical personnel read some weird things into that designation.

My spouse knows what I want done and has full authority to make decisions if things happen that I couldn't have anticipated and "enough is enough." I am far more comfortable with that than basically letting doctors decide when "enough is enough."
224 posted on 08/28/2007 7:50:35 PM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson