Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian air defense missile factory running at full capacity
Kommersant,Russia ^ | Aug. 25, 2007

Posted on 08/25/2007 5:23:06 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Almaz Antey Running at Full Capacity

Both long-range and short-range Russian air defense complexes are popular exports. Those exports almost doubled last year, and now the Almaz Antey plant is working at full capacity, including the production of the S-400 Triumph system for the Russian Defense Ministry. Russia's military exports have increased every year since the late 1990s, keeping Russia in second place on the world arms market. Air defense systems were last among Russian arms exports all those years, in spite of repeated claims by officials that their sales would be picking up. Then last year it really happened. Air defense accounted for 9.2 percent of military exports last year, worth $600 million, up from 5.1 percent and $310 million in 2005.

If the Pantsir-S1 complex is put into mass production, Russian air defense exports may grow to $1-1.5 billion annually on a world market of $5-6 billion. Experts say that the air operations that have distinguished warfare in the last decade are an indication of the low capability of land-based air defenses. That, in turns, guarantees the eternal popularity of fighter jets.

The main Russian air defense products on the world market are the S-300PMU family of complexes, with a range of up to 200 km. and strike elevation of up to 27 km., and the Tor-M1 family, with a range of 12 km. and strike elevation of 6 km. China is the main customer for the S-300. Beijing signed contracts for about $1.14 billion for the purchase of 12 divisions of S-300PMU in 1996 and 2001, thanks to which several plants were kept running. Those contracts were followed by orders in 2004 and 2006 for a total of 16 divisions of S-300PMU-2 Favorite for $2 billion. Delivery on those orders will begin this year. Finally, China paid $200 million for two complexes of the naval adaptation of the system, the S-300F Reef, for installation on its 052C cruisers.

Other purchases for the 300 series have been Cyprus (two divisions of the S-300PMU-1 in 1997 for $230 million, relocated to Crete after an ultimatum from Turkey), Vietnam (two divisions of the S-300PMU-1 in 2003 for $230 million), Kazakhstan (a contract was signed in 2000 for the delivery of eight divisions in exchange for property removed at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union) and Belarus (four divisions of S-300PS from the stock of the Russian Armed Forces with delivery beginning in April 2006).

Algeria signed a package of contracts in April of this year for weapons deliveries worth about $8 billion that included four divisions of S-300-PMU-2 and 38 Pantsir-S1 complexes. Libya may become a customer for the S-300PMU-2 in the future and rumors of possible sales of the system to Syria and Iran have long been circulating on the market.

Export of the S-400 generation may begin soon. The United Arab Emirates expressed interest in the new system in 2002. No contract has been signed yet, but consultations are ongoing. Another major purchaser of S-300 and possibly S-400 systems may be India. Experts say that country could place defense orders of $5 billion or more. The first S-400 division in Russia went on duty this month in Elektrostal, outside Moscow.

The Tor-M1 is another successful Almaz Antey product overseas. China was the first customer for it, signing contracts in 1996 and 1999 to take delivery of 27 Tor complexes for a total of about $900 million. Greece bought 31 Tor-M1 in 1998 and 2000 for $860 million. Several of those Tor systems, along with Os systems, were placed on Cyprus this year t replace the S-300PMU-1 systems moved to Crete.

After that, that was a five-year period without any Tor sales, which ended in 2005 with the announcement of the purchase by Iran of 29 Tor complexes (probably for $800 million), mainly to defend the Bushehr atomic energy station being built by Russia. Washington reacted notably calmly to that deal. The Tor would be incapable of striking high-flying American jet carrying cruise missiles. Four Tor-M1 complexes were delivered to Egypt in 2005 under an agreement to modernize that country's outdated missile forces.

Twelve Tor-M1 systems that Greece did not buy under option were purchased by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in January of this year. Libya and Saudi Arabia have also expressed interest in the Tor. Analysts say that a new model with a range of 15 km. would be more successful on the market.

The Russian middle-range Buk complex has seen little demand on the world market in recent years. In 1996-1997, 18 Buk complexes were delivered to Finland as payment of the Soviet Union's debt to that country. Since then, Rosoboronexport has advertised the Buk-M1-2 at all international arms exhibitions, but without success. The problem with sales lies in the great reliability of the previous model, the Square (export version of the 2K12 Cube), which remains in use in more than 20 countries.

Almaz Antey has announced that a sales breakthrough for the Buk was made at the end of last year. Experts suggest that the customer was Egypt, since Cairo had expressed interest in updating its Squares as well. It seems the first stage in that upgrade was the direct delivery of a lot of Buk-M2E complexes. Russia has thus returned to a market it lost in the 1970s that the United States has dominated since then. Libya and Malaysia are also considering Buk purchases. Demand for the Buk remains soft, however. Experts note that the system is relatively expensive.

Almaz Antey has a competitor within Russia for the production of air defense systems. That is the KBP Instrument Design Bureau federal state unitary enterprise in Tula, which was not included in the Almaz Antey holding because it also manufactures other types of weapon. KBP's Pantsir-S1 short-range air defense system is a serious competitor to the Tor-M1. The Pantsir is only at the testing test at present, but major contracts for it have been signed with the UAR (50 complexes), Syria (36) and Algeria (38). The Russian Air Force will buy more than 100 of them when testing is completed. Experts say KBP will be running at full capacity through 2011-2012 with those orders and was even forced to turn down an order from Venezuela for them. A naval version of the Pantsir may also be developed.

www.kommersant.com All the Article in Russian as of Aug. 23, 2007


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; armsbuildup; missiledefense; missiles; russia; russianmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2007 5:23:08 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Here we go again..
2 posted on 08/25/2007 5:32:00 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (Tis a day the Lord hath made!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6

The dawn of a new Cold War.


3 posted on 08/25/2007 5:47:02 AM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08! Return our country to the era of Reagan Conservatism now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; DAVEY CROCKETT; FARS; milford421; Founding Father; CarolinaGOP

Ping.


4 posted on 08/25/2007 5:50:22 AM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (This is "Be an Angel Day", do something nice for someone today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6

Keep your gun clean.


5 posted on 08/25/2007 5:54:16 AM PDT by wastedyears (Alright, hold tight, I'm a highway staaaaaaaaaaaaarrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stm

If we do enter the second Cold War, it’s not from the tail end of WWII. If Congress were to get the sticks out of their butts and put money to the military, we would easily beat Russia again.


6 posted on 08/25/2007 5:59:45 AM PDT by wastedyears (Alright, hold tight, I'm a highway staaaaaaaaaaaaarrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

You are so right, history to repeat itself...Ought to make some dems happy.


7 posted on 08/25/2007 6:10:02 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (Tis a day the Lord hath made!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
For decades the policy of MAD, Mutual Assured Destruction, prevented the Russians from making a first strike on the U. S. They were assured that any missile fired at the U. S. would be shot down and that the U. S. would retaliate.

But what now? Russia will soon have a missile defense system and the U. S. will not. What will then prevent the MAD Russians from striking first?

Our only defense will be: When Russia launches a fleet of missiles we can hunker down under a table, face away from the explosion and pray (optional). As the white-hot heat of the nuclear blast turns us back into the dust from whence we can we can be consoled by the thought that we did not spend money on a missile defense system that would not work 100 percent of the time anyway.

8 posted on 08/25/2007 6:12:50 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What high energy prices fund: more and more weapons for the Middle East.


9 posted on 08/25/2007 6:21:06 AM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal

“Russia will soon have a missile defense system and the U. S. will not”

They’ll also be able to travel through time.


10 posted on 08/25/2007 6:27:37 AM PDT by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Putin wants Russia to be a military power again. Exporting arms is the only way he can fund it. Looks like the SEAD folks will be busy for years to come. Even the most sophisticated SAM sites may worthless as deterrents if stealthy UCAVs can take them out.


11 posted on 08/25/2007 6:32:42 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I’m trying to come up with products that Russia sells to the world. The only things I can think of are oil and weapons. As an aside, oil and weapons are two things the Demonrats supposedly hate the most, but they sure loved the Soviets.
12 posted on 08/25/2007 6:40:28 AM PDT by GBA ( God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sandreckoner

And they’ll have sharks with lasers on their frickin’ heads.


13 posted on 08/25/2007 6:54:43 AM PDT by wastedyears (Alright, hold tight, I'm a highway staaaaaaaaaaaaarrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

14 posted on 08/25/2007 7:06:47 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
For decades the policy of MAD, Mutual Assured Destruction, prevented the Russians from making a first strike on the U. S. They were assured that any missile fired at the U. S. would be shot down and that the U. S. would retaliate

I don't think the MAD policy assured the Soviets we would shoot down their missiles. If the Russians attacked the US, it would be impossible for them to destroy our entire nuclear counter-strike capability. We had nuclear weapons on bombers, submarines, and silos.

The US would be able to destroy the Soviet Union even if the United States itself was destroyed.

15 posted on 08/25/2007 7:18:48 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

bump for later read.


16 posted on 08/25/2007 7:23:40 AM PDT by Sal (My "good" Senator Kyl exposed himself as a Grand Betrayer, corrupt to the core!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal

That’s not exactly true.The Russians don’t have anything as good as the American SM-3 or the missile defense interceptors being deployed in Alaska & Eastern Europe,which can take out strategic ballistic missiles beyond the atmosphere.The Russian S-400 or S-300 maybe deadly against aircraft,but they are of marginal use against strategic missiles.


17 posted on 08/25/2007 7:53:10 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
HARM are a better countermeasure actually.

The Tor is a quite capable system. Iran bought 29 batteries, but each has 4 launch vehicles and each of those carries 8 missiles, so that is over 850 actual missiles. They are designed to shoot down PGMs on approach - cruise missiles or laser guided bombs or JDAMs etc. As well as aircraft, of course, but only under 20,000 feet. But a high enough speed anti-radiation missile (homing on their radar) might be too fast for them to engage. (You need better than Mach 2 or they will work). The radar isn't high signature though - phased array so works at low power.

18 posted on 08/25/2007 8:49:27 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
S-400 can KO missiles - the top speed of the target they can engage is about 5 kilometers per second. Beyond the atmosphere ballistic missile warheads might be faster than that, but re-entry slows them down. It can certainly hit them at the lower speeds they have in the atmosphere. They have deployed a battery of them around Moscow as a point missile defense. It is comparable to the Navy's THAAD system, basically.
19 posted on 08/25/2007 8:53:47 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

Come on.... nothing the russians have actually is comparable to US Mil.

Potato drinkin doesn’t lead to high tech.


20 posted on 08/25/2007 9:19:46 AM PDT by dusttoyou (FredHead from the git go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson