To: tpaine
You mean that the constitution isn’t a “living document” subject to change whenever some leftist thinks it’s time?
2 posted on
08/23/2007 12:40:56 PM PDT by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: vetsvette
3 posted on
08/23/2007 12:48:00 PM PDT by
Jason_b
(Click jason_b to the left here and read something about People v. De La Guerra 40 Cal. 311)
To: vetsvette
You mean that the constitution isn't a "living document" subject to change whenever some leftist thinks it's time? I mean that the constitution is our supreme Law of the Land, -- and our inalienable rights are not subject to change whenever, -- just because some leftist - [or a rightist like Bork], thinks it's OK..
5 posted on
08/23/2007 12:55:54 PM PDT by
tpaine
(" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson