Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ignatz

Actually, it’s better to borrow the million WHEN you have a million - so as to keep the million earning money for you in interest or investments.

;-)


109 posted on 08/21/2007 1:39:29 PM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson once set fire to a crowd of liberals simply by puffing his cigar and staring real hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight
Actually, it's better to not borrow at all.
Let's say you had a million dollars earning 10%/year.
You want to buy a million dollar house, so you borrow against your million at 5%. Now, you're only getting 5% effecetively on your million, and we haven't even discussed taxes yet!
Ok, so let's say that after all yearly taxes and fees are taken out, your million is earning 3% effective, against your million dollar mortgage.
3% is about the average rate of inflation, so you are not gaining purchasing power at all.

What if, instead, you paid a million CASH for your house, and then put the money you WOULD have been paying out in mortgage principle and interest each month for the next fifteen or 30 years into investments? In pretty short order you'd have your million back and earning 10% again, AND you'd have a paid-for house!

125 posted on 08/21/2007 1:53:04 PM PDT by Ignatz (NPC's have feelings, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson