Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aruanan
There are a lot of other things involved. In the matter of anthropogenic GW, it turns out that even doubling, tripling, or quadrupling the total amount of atmospheric CO2 wouldn't have effect past a certain (small) point).

Didn't you just negate this "The fact that the numbers are small or that the amount of one thing is tiny in comparison to other things has nothing at all to do with whether or not it can have a large impact." with your concluding statement?

That's part of the whole argument against CO2 increases causing global warming. Since other factors ARE involved simply claiming that CO2 increases as the main cause of GW, as the GW alarminsts are now touting, cannot be the sole cause of GW.

24 posted on 08/21/2007 5:31:15 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: raybbr

Any scientist who dismisses global warming is a tool of the Oil Industries.


27 posted on 08/21/2007 5:37:38 AM PDT by JusPasenThru (Just another angry military veteran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson