Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
Well maybe you did somewhere and I didn't see it, but do poor small-brained me a favor. Provide the explanation in your reply to this post. Tell me why you think the sentence on gravity is context for the fact claim in this sentence.
We see it going the other way neutron > proton-electron-neutrino), but not that way except in our theories and imaginations.
And just so we're perfectly clear, "that way" is proton+electron => neutron+neutrino which we do observe in a form of beta decay (I may have been wrong in calling it beta plus - this particular decay is called "inverse beta decay" or "electron capture." But my point stands, protons and electrons combining to create neutrons observed, just as is postulated in the formation of neutron stars.)
185 posted on 11/13/2007 3:23:17 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: edsheppa
"But my point stands, protons and electrons combining to create neutrons observed, just as is postulated in the formation of neutron stars."

Here is your error, if you are able to comprehend it.

186 posted on 11/13/2007 3:31:36 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson