Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/19/2007 6:40:37 PM PDT by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: JACKRUSSELL

Nope. I’d rather fly duty free to Puerto Rico as our Fifty-First State, Thank You!

Nothing against Canadians...who tend to run in my family, Eh! :)


2 posted on 08/19/2007 6:43:17 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Can we take in Alberta and forget the rest?


3 posted on 08/19/2007 6:43:49 PM PDT by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fanfan
Ping
6 posted on 08/19/2007 6:49:58 PM PDT by kanawa (Don't go where you're looking, look where you're going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fanfan; GMMAC

Ping.


7 posted on 08/19/2007 6:50:56 PM PDT by Springman (Why is ? coming up, when I use ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I thought the Canadians wanted to preserve their current status as a colony like Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands.


8 posted on 08/19/2007 6:52:07 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I’d rather it not. One: It’s forcing the “no borders” globalist agenda, and two: their health care sucks and it would likely be pushed for in the rest of the country. The hockey’s good though, that’d be the only plus. Though I wouldn’t mind just taking conservative Alberta and leaving the rest.


10 posted on 08/19/2007 6:52:42 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (From my fist to Harry Reid's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

How about a trade? Massachusetts for Alberta? Toss in San Francisco for Vancouver as well.


11 posted on 08/19/2007 6:52:54 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I’ll take the western provinces. The rest can join France.


15 posted on 08/19/2007 6:54:07 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

For years and years, The POQ has been trying to break away from Canada and either become their own country or be annexed by the United States. When I was growing up, many moons ago, people were planning this. This is nothing new to Quebec. As far as the rest of Canada, They would rather not have any part or be part of the US. Personally, I believe it would be a mistake to allow Canada to become the 51st state. Many problems would occur due to this. Mostly, an overload on our medical system/ It’s broken now, it would devastate the program if that many people were introduced into it. I think the US has enough problems of her own, not to pick up someone else’s problems like buying a used car.


16 posted on 08/19/2007 6:57:09 PM PDT by antiunion person (THOMPSON/PAUL 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL
ALL YOUR EAGLE ARE BELONG TO US

Near Grand Rapids, Manitoba
19 posted on 08/19/2007 7:09:28 PM PDT by kanawa (Don't go where you're looking, look where you're going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I say yes, but only if we get to rename it “Canuckistan”...


21 posted on 08/19/2007 7:15:04 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL
I want to be able to travel to Canada without having to pay almost a hundred bucks for a friggin' passport.
22 posted on 08/19/2007 7:18:25 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Will Canada Become the 51st State?

I thought they already were.


27 posted on 08/19/2007 7:28:21 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL; Disgusted in Texas; B Knotts; ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; corbos; NYFreeper; Alexius; ..
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

31 posted on 08/19/2007 7:35:25 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Yuck! No thanks. Republicans would never win another election. Happy to have them where they are, 80% of them huddled within 100 miles of our border.


35 posted on 08/19/2007 7:41:04 PM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

that’s stupid.

we can’t run our own country.


39 posted on 08/19/2007 7:48:25 PM PDT by ken21 (28 yrs +2 families = banana republic junta. si.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL
The framework for a North American super-state already exists. It's called the U.S. Constitution.

There's just one problem: the Socialists hate the Constitution. That's the reason for the SPP...they can write up their own Constitution to replace the current one.

40 posted on 08/19/2007 7:54:45 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

We could do a lot worse than including Alberta as a 51st state.


41 posted on 08/19/2007 7:59:24 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

Headline makes no sense — if this idea ever went forward it could not be that all of Canada would come in as one “51st state” — there would be at least 10 new states based upon current provinces.... but there would be great controversy about allotting 2 US Senators to the most sparsely populated provinces such as PEI, Nova Scotia, Yukon, etc. I see that the website does not allot senators to some of those entities, but it would be highly controversial either way.

I cannot see most people on either side of the border going for this, but who knows? As a US citizen with some Canadian ancestry I am not automatically averse to the idea, but it could be terrible if it merely cemented rampant socialism north and south, and that seems to be the most likely outcome.


42 posted on 08/19/2007 8:02:20 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JACKRUSSELL

I really like you...as a friend.


50 posted on 08/19/2007 8:31:27 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson