Well you sucessfully reiterated what was already in the article.
I just don’t buy it.
I will point out that this “Nifonging” you refer to is a little bit off the money. First, Nifong didn’t get to the point of trial with those boys, whereas this prosecutor, or prosecutors as I think there was more than one involved, had this case in trial in front of a jury.
Not quite the same thing as Nifong so your cute verbalization is untrue.
It’s the NY Times! The NY Times trying to tell us that all of these fellows confessed to a crime because they USED TO BE IN THE MILITARY.
You don’t find that at all odd? Plus my other arguments up thread.
Hey, whatever floats your boat.
One of them is very low IQ, actually I’m willing to bet most of them are as dumb as a box of rocks.
The low IQ one has a CO who swears he was shipboard at the time of the murder but he was never contacted to testify and records were never requested because Joe Dick made a plea deal in exchange for testimony that convicted the others.
What I’m not buying is a group rape/murder in a 700 sq foot apartment that left no physical evidence and no DNA of any of the alleged perpetrators and no mess. The lady was killed by someone she knew and let into her home. And her girlfriend knows who that someone is.
I think the orginal investigator was a lazy bully who did crap police work.