The Principles of Freedom vs. Public/Private Partnerships-CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

www.canadafreepress.com/ ^ | August 15, 2007 | Tom DeWeese,

[philman_36]

Since I've given support for the premise isn't it your turn to now show that it won't affect about one million people?

[Petronski]

Your source said:

...and as many as one million people could be affected.

Your premise is:

...one million Texans are about to lose their land...

Your source does not support your premise. You have failed.

[philman_36]

I said homes or land.
Yes, you said...
If one million people were going to be thrown out of their homes or off their land...
Meaning everyone would have one or the other happen to them. It was only later, after calling you on it, that you changed your tune to...
Some people will lose some land.
Which even now you're modifying what you're saying...
Some will lose land only, some will lose land with a home on it.
I've got to go. Besides, all you're trying to do now is find some way to weasel out of what did.
Have a nice day.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Meaning everyone would have one or the other happen to them.

The author you quoted said one million people will lose their land. There are two types of land they can lose, land with a home on it and land without a home on it.

But nice try.

[eeevil conservative]

bookmark

[hedgetrimmer]

LOL. Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed this afternoon?

[philman_36]

What is is with the two of you that you're willing to create such a name for yourselves as defenders of the TTC.
You nit pick in technicalities in some feeble maneuver to say "Nuh-uh, what's happening right before your very eyes isn't happening right before your very eyes."
I've seen some sad things on FR in my time, but this is the saddest.