Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Reclaimed land can be far superior to the natural land. In Fairbanks where water giants were used to clear 100 feet of frozen muck and then the floating dredges used to scoop gravel, the gravel left behind provides the most stable building surfaces around here. While modern mining requires settling ponds and dams and looks sweet only to engineers, when it is all over the land is much improved and has actual positive value.


37 posted on 08/18/2007 8:20:04 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

No question about it. The land we mined and reclaimed produced a better crop, had better drainage, was terraced with ponds at the low corners (not last cut impoundments which are awful) and was worth more per acre. The land owner received a royalty on his coal and got his land back in superior condition. The federal surface mine law overreached in many areas but was generally beneficial.


41 posted on 08/18/2007 9:13:17 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson