A conservative voting for a liberal is what in unintelligent and guaranteed to result in the advancement of liberalism.
I'd much rather have Hillary in office for four years with a chance of electing a conservative in 2012 and with the an increasing number of Republicans in Congress than be stuck with a liberal Republican or Democrat for eight years and shrinking Republican minority in Congress.
A conservative voting against the Republican nominee is what is unintelligent and will guarantee the advancement of liberalism...because this time, they're going to try to do away with the electoral college and implement universal socialist health care. Once that happens, you can say goodbye to a Republican President for 20 years...in fact, it's entirely possible that I won't see another one in my lifetime...and by then the terrorist-appeasing pro-amnesty America-hating anti-war wing of the Democrat Party will have done its damage. It will be too late. Wake the hell up.
I'd much rather have Hillary in office for four years with a chance of electing a conservative in 2012 and with the an increasing number of Republicans in Congress than be stuck with a liberal Republican or Democrat for eight years and shrinking Republican minority in Congress.
This will not be your scenario should you allow Hillary to be elected by not voting against her in the only real sense...by voting Republican.
You've got a lot to learn about this woman.
NO CONSERVATIVE WILL CAST A MEANINGLESS, THROW-AWAY THIRD PARTY VOTE TO TEACH REPUBLICANS A LESSON IN '08.
(now please, if you have any pull at all, see about getting Fred Thompson on the stick.)