Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bootless
the seeds of 9-11 grew. Every attack on us (WTC 1) or our interests (Khobar Towers, the African embassies, the Cole and probably Oklohoma City) was ignored or treated as a criminal act - not an act of war - and enabled and emboldened the Islamists.

Those events would not have occurred if president Carter had responded to the 9/4/1979 act of war by Iran as a President should have.

231 posted on 08/18/2007 3:23:24 PM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: ASA Vet
Those events would not have occurred if president Carter had responded to the 9/4/1979 act of war by Iran as a President should have.

I agree completely.

I also believe that at each turning point during Carter's and Clinton's terms, there were multiple opportunities to respond to each act of war appropriately. It's just like the accident chain: it starts with one thing, and if it stops with appropriate and positive act, you will break the chain. Neither Carter nor Clinton kept us three mistakes above the ground.

So, I wonder how the Clintons view Carter? Think he'd have some "traitor emeritus" position in her administration?

I think he would, and I also believe that would be a deliberate blow from within to our troops.

I would recommend reading "Unlimited Access," written some time ago by Gary Aldrich, the FBI agent assigned to the Clinton White House. I know you've probably read it - but I wanted to put that title out there.

People are worried about the turn to being pro-life by Romney? I'm glad he changed his mind for the better. Hillary will never object to PBA. She is without honor.

232 posted on 08/18/2007 3:36:24 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson