Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TommyDale
Sort of hard to believe that they could measure so accurately at 3 feet.

I think the primary error source would be due to timing the arrival of the pulses.

With modern frequency standards, you can get timing to fractions of a nanosecond, which corresponds to distances of a lot less than 3 feet. For a properly calibrated system, the "error regions" around each detector would not overlap, and you should be able to detect the phenomenon in question, if it occurs.

Or ... you could measure the speed of light.

146 posted on 08/16/2007 10:55:38 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
Current test equipment can locate a fault within inches over a distance of 25 miles, but measuring the actual speed isn’t feasible. Like you said, the precise “arrival time” cannot be measured accurately and would be definitely be difficult to prove that a lightwave arrived before it actually left. That entire idea is preposterous.
167 posted on 08/16/2007 11:06:56 AM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson