Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: webstersII
A meal literally fit for a Kinge or well paying traveler may not reflect what the peasants were eating.
41 posted on 08/15/2007 9:08:28 PM PDT by null and void (I hate to suggest something this radical, but why not let the policy follow the facts? ~ReignOfError)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

“A meal literally fit for a Kinge or well paying traveler may not reflect what the peasants were eating.”

If you read the whole article it addresses that quite well. The lower classes ate animal products, they just ate alot more organ meats and not as much of the prime cuts. For example, the intestines were referred to as “umbles”, and that was the main ingredient in “umble pie”. That’s where the modern expression “humble pie” came from.

Also, all the classes ate as lots of fat. The muscle tissue was no doubt much leaner than today’s corn-fed beef but they preferred the fat and the fattier cuts. Most of the lower classes ate meat stews with bread as a regular meal, washed down with beer or wine since they didn’t have refrigeration to keep liquids from spoiling.


53 posted on 08/16/2007 6:13:24 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson