Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jude24
No, she is not a public figure. Public figures are celebrities and public officials, not students who did well in an athletic competition. More importantly, however, calling them "ho's" is per se defamatory at common law (and still in many states), since it impinges upon her reputation for chastity. She has a very real case - and Imus would do well to take it very seriously. He did defame these girls with absolutely no justification.

He never mentioned her by name. Sports teams get called all kinds of things by writers, talking heads, and fans alike. The team may have some kind of complaint, but obviously they have better lawyers who see the futility of it all.

this is going nowhere.

79 posted on 08/15/2007 7:05:47 AM PDT by NeonKnight (We don't believe you, you need more people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: NeonKnight
Sports teams get called all kinds of things by writers, talking heads, and fans alike.

The team was not called "nappy-headed ho's." The girls on the team were. You might have a point if the team were called "the biggest bunch of sucks that ever did suck" or something - but there's no credible way you can interpret the slur "bunch of nappy-headed ho's" to refer to the team, not the girls.

80 posted on 08/15/2007 7:09:18 AM PDT by jude24 (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson