For me its that Romney is such a proven capable leader.. at key things like cutting duplication and waste, which the government badly needs. In some cases we have 40 agencies in charge fo doing the same thing, which is insane. But people without executive experience its doubtful they can make the government much more efficient. Hes a turnaround expert with proven experience in doing exactly that.
Ideologically hes so so to me. Hunter is far better in that case. If it was a non-executive position like Senator or congressman I wouldn’t be supporting Romney.
I think Romney is a little too in love with the idea of being Prez, kind of like Clinton, he loooves the limelight. If elected I don’t see him coming into government and slashing government waste, etc. I see him flashing his big toothy grin
and hoping to be known as the “most handsome President”, that’s how I see it, I could be wrong ;)