[Rudder]

BS! He could have done this since his first day in Congress. He could bring up a bill tomorrow morning. Has he ever introduced a bill to repeal R vs W? No.

Pandering to one-issue voters won't get him the nomination.

[freekitty]

I agree most with you. He could have done something about this a long time ago.

[Fast Ed97]

Has he ever introduced a bill to repeal R vs W?

Even the most strident pro-life congressmen (Dornan, Hyde ect) never introduced such a measure. It would take a constitutional amendment overturning a Supreme Court decision. Otherwise, I am sure the congress would have gladly overturned a number of the decisions that came out the Supreme Court in the 60's-70's regarding 1st Amendment and defendant rights....Not to mention that infamous flag burning case in 80 which drove everyone nuts for about a year.

[dcwusmc]

WRONG... see: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1878515/posts#17

[JoinJuniorAchievement]

He could have done this since his first day in Congress. He could bring up a bill tomorrow morning. Has he ever introduced a bill to repeal R vs W? No.

He has introduced legislation to define life at conception EVERY year he has been in office.
Wake up.
He is the only candidate worth voting for.
don't waste your vote on Hillary.

[elhombrelibre]

The man is a flake and a phony. Don’t buy the Ron Paul solution on pro-life unless you’re willingly to give into a lot of other immoral Paulisms that are equally anti-life.

[nmh]

“BS! He could have done this since his first day in Congress. He could bring up a bill tomorrow morning. Has he ever introduced a bill to repeal R vs W? No.
Pandering to one-issue voters won’t get him the nomination.”

Yes, it is BS.

If we had a dictator then he’d have a shot. Besides that abortion must be at the FEDERAL level and be ILLEGAL as it used to be. This one is NOT a STATE level issue.

[Dead Corpse]

Maybe you can point out where in the Constitution it gives the FedGov this power?

Here's a hint: It ain't there.