To: mnehrling
As President Bush himself said on September 17, 2003: "Weve had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th [attacks]." ... Yet in a January 8, 2004 press conference, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell acknowledged: "There is not ... concrete evidence about the connection".(For the record, I'm a former John Birch Society member.)
And I should believe you ;o)
53 posted on
08/08/2007 1:57:19 PM PDT by
4CJ
(Annoy a liberal, honour Christians and our gallant Confederate dead)
To: 4CJ
You have fallen into the same trap that we hear from many anti-war leftists..
your comments are referring to the specific 9/11 attack, I didn’t say anything about the 9/11 attack, I said connection to Al Quaeda. There wasn’t evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11, there was evidence that he had a connection to Al Quaeda.
57 posted on
08/08/2007 2:00:13 PM PDT by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
To: 4CJ
You have fallen into the same trap that we hear from many anti-war leftists..
your comments are referring to the specific 9/11 attack, I didn’t say anything about the 9/11 attack, I said connection to Al Quaeda. There wasn’t evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11, there was evidence that he had a connection to Al Quaeda.
58 posted on
08/08/2007 2:00:18 PM PDT by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson