Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
The real priority was ensuring there wasn’t a second 9-11.

Not sure if I agree, but to refute this point I'd have to change the subject. But we do agree then that going after binladen has been a low priority. right?

334 posted on 08/09/2007 5:35:57 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: WhiteGuy

I believe that capturing Bin Laden was lower in priortiy than preventing another attack on the scale of 9/11. I’m surprised that you would not share that belief. Would you really trade the lives of 3000 Americans for Bin Laden’s capture?


344 posted on 08/09/2007 2:57:51 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (A patriot will cast their vote in the manner most likely to deny power to democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson