BS, they want a man they can dominate. As Dr. Laura would say; This is great until you need a real man and don’t have one.
Actually, this is just more of the emasculating feminist political/social agenda bull.
Having just nearly gotten married to one of those types this summer, I can attest to this. And I kissed her arse pretty good. It all came down her having to have total control, to the point where she basically told me I was her bitch. It was over about a week later, two weeks before the wedding.
Now she is with her former, er, sex buddy. Wouldn’t call him a boyfriend. He’s pretty much a short, dumpy lump of clay that will do whatever she says to get laid, but will never commit. BUT, she is in total control. Every time I see her at work she looks less and less happy, and keeps him more and more at arms length.
There's an old game that consists of "Have the sensitive guy support you, but cheat on him with the macho male"
I would like to see a study looking at why women are attracted to men like the police officer in Ohio who last month killed his pregnant girlfriend with the help of an old high school girlfriend, had a wife and child at home, a child with the dead girlfriend, and another child by another woman.
There has to be some kind of a sliding scale, with men like this police officer at one end—extremely masculine but also violent and anti-social, and at the other end is John Edwards and Richard Simmons.
This is complete BS for feminist women who want eunachs not men.
This is about a rehab campaign for the Political Correctness emasculation of men to resume since we see time and time again that real men do step up to save the day.
Did anyone else notice the stories of MEN stepping up to rescue those children on the bridge? (apparently the girly men nearby did not do much)
exactly my thought; what the women want is a stay at home pussy cat, who will look the other way, while they have sex with the construction guy next door....