There is no way in the world I am going to search a 2000(?) post thread to find proof for YOU. Many of the Giuliani supporters thought that abortion was acceptable, and there was one wacko who was banned for saying that the parents of handicapped kids should be allowed to kill them.
And I didn’t say that everyone who was banned asked or opused. Those were among the myriad of reasons. Each one was a bit different.
Backtracking again, I see.
While I dispute your statement that “many” Giuliani supporters thought “that abortion was acceptable,” nevertheless it is clear that even if your statement were true, you cannot possible equate that with “advocating” abortion and infanticide, as you clearly posed in your first post to me.
And was the “wacko” who was banned a “wacko” or a long-time, formerly respected poster who got under someone’s skin because he supported the “wrong” candidate? Do you know?
I hope you’ll take me up on my suggestion to surf through some of my posts and some of JR’s on “those” threads. Instead of claiming you somehow know I wasn’t even there, you might learn something.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts?q=1&;page=51
Do you think this is an appropriate post? Was the post to which the poster responded even especially provocative or personal? If the founder responds thusly, should someone be banned for---oh, boo hoo---swearing at him, if that even occurred?
Click on the link to the NY Observer story in the article on this very thread and read the comments. Just for. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: quidnunc Up yours asswipe. 56 posted on 04/21/2007 6:57:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson