Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lead Pipes vs. Leaky Pipes (FR extensively mentioned)
Hugh Hewit's blog ^ | August 05, 2007 | Patrick Ruffini, eCampaign Director at the Republican National Committee

Posted on 08/05/2007 4:54:00 AM PDT by Tree of Liberty

The netroots is reveling in Chicago, and the natural reaction is to ask, “Where’s our YearlyKos?”

It’s a good question, but ultimately a short-sighted one from an historical perspective. Go back and re-read the TNR piece on the netroots from May. Especially this part:

The Democratic leadership and the liberal intelligentsia seemed pathetic and exhausted, wedded to musty ideals of bipartisanship and decorousness. Meanwhile, what the netroots saw in the Republican Party, they largely admired. They saw a genuine mass movement built up over several decades. They saw a powerful message machine. And they saw a political elite bound together with ironclad party discipline.

This, they decided, is what the Democratic Party needed. And, when they saw that the party leadership was incapable of creating it, they decided to do it themselves. “We are at the beginning of a comprehensive reformation of the Democratic Party,” write Moulitsas and Armstrong.

Who is jealous of who here? YearlyKos, and also the Take Back America Conference, were almost certainly borne of the question “Where is our CPAC?” Some of those covering this act as though the idea of a conference with thousands of grassroots activists and Presidential candidates falling all over themselves to speak is totally unheard of on the right. Um, no. The netroots was built on Xeroxing the Goldwater-Reagan Revolution in the Republican Party. Almost always, it was conservatives who were the initial innovators.

When covering the netroots vs. the rightroots, reporters look at things through a particular frame that by definition excludes the vast majority of grassroots activity on the right. For something to be newsworthy in this space, it must be blog-based, it must have emerged in the last five years, and it must be focused on elections over legislative or policy outcomes.

The problem with this angle is that most of the conservative institutions online emerged in the late Clinton Administration or immediately after 9/11. At their peak, they were larger than Daily Kos, and arguably some still are. And they rarely receive any scrutiny because they don’t fit the frame. From a macro movement-building perspective, the left catching us to us is being covered as a need for us to catch up with something the left has invented anew.

And despite how unfair that narrative is, there’s something to it. The conservative analog to YearlyKos is 30 years old. The 800lb. gorillas of the conservative Web initially went online in the 1995-97 timeframe. And many have failed to innovate. They are still Web 1.0, where the Left jumped directly into Web 2.0 in the Bush years. Consider:

My co-blogger Hugh Hewitt refers to the “lead pipes” of the left-wing blogosphere that are slowly but surely contaminating the groundwater in the Democratic Party. But if their pipes are dirty, ours are leaky and badly in need of an overhaul. (At least if one wants to do more than just pass along positive information about the war.)

It would be one thing if we didn’t have any of these institutions, and could start from scratch just as the netroots did. My fear is that we have a bunch of institutions that still function somewhat well, but are long past their prime. With that, there is the danger we will slowly die without knowing it, as our techniques gradually lose effectiveness year after year. Just like newspaper circulation numbers. And there are a number of people on the right who are still complacent about this.

It seems to me that the numbers are there to do something great around the 2008 elections, and that all we need to do is effectively tap into the conservative blogosphere. I looked at N.Z. Bear’s traffic stats for political blogs with over 20,000 visits a day. And the visitor gap between left and right was lower than I could remember in some time: 1.2 million to 870,000 for the left (half of the left’s total was Kos).

Looking beyond the blogosphere, a place the MSM isn’t as familiar with, and you’ll see that the conservative Web is larger than the liberal Web. Sites like Townhall, WorldNetDaily, and Free Republic have monthly audiences that regularly beat Daily Kos and the Huffington Post, to say nothing of Drudge, which still reigns supreme.

So the people are there, just as they’ve always been. My concern with some of the sites I discussed above is that for ten long years, they haven’t been giving our people Web experiences that teach them how to be more than simple readers.


TOPICS: Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: checkyourfacts; hughhewitt; kos; newmedia; patrickruffini; rathergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-269 next last
To: Cannoneer No. 4
This forum ain't what it used to be.

I agree. We don't get the thoughtful analysis and discussions that we used too. We did a poor job of educating new members on how to use this forum.

As soon as an article is posted we now get 50 to 100 posts that mostly say the same thing. There is a rush to post something witty or a recycled graphic. Many don't bother to read the full article, that has become worse now that almost everything is excerpted.

I gravitate towards threads dealing with science, technology, economics and the military. Some of the people that browse-in and start spouting uninformed opinions are down-right stupid.

101 posted on 08/05/2007 7:18:12 AM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rob777
“I don’t think the Republican party is so overwhelmingly conservative as the dems are so completely liberal.”That is where the difference lies.

The silent majority in the Rat Party are citizens that love a government supplying benefits/handouts. They are basically apolitical, IMO.

The silent majority in the GOP Party are God-Fearing Americans with personal goals and an appreciation of a "get off your ass" attitude.

That's the basic difference.

102 posted on 08/05/2007 7:19:03 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Leisler; WorkingClassFilth
One good thing you can be sure of with Hugh is that if you were in a bar fight, by the time you got to the car, it would be all warmed up and with windows defrosted.

THAT
has to be one of the best comments I have seen on FR.

Outstanding ! ROTFLMAO

103 posted on 08/05/2007 7:23:03 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Already being done (though not by Jim or John Robinson).
104 posted on 08/05/2007 7:24:15 AM PDT by Tree of Liberty (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Thank you.


105 posted on 08/05/2007 7:25:32 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
has eveerything to do with "leadership" losing its way - not the grassroots failing to act.

What leadership? Far and away the smartest we have is Newt, but everyone worries that every once in a while he will have a brain seizure and do something really dumb. It doesn't detract from what he says when he is being smart, but it does raise the question of his capability to be president 24/7.

106 posted on 08/05/2007 7:26:09 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Wrong. FR has ALWAYS been marginalized. It is too grass roots for the RNC, a Tory elitist, financialists, hereditary organization that at it best disdains working class conservatives in the millions, small business in the hundred of thousands with their petty gripes.

To some extent, the set of conservative sites on the Net can serve as a "shadow RNC", and to an extent supplant it (which has the elites worried).

What is the RNC at its essence? It is an organization which sets the tone of what the Republican party as a whole should be, and enforces its position by its ability to grant or withhold support, recognition, and soft money funding to individual candidates

Well, what is FR doing? We let people know about the strengths and weaknesses of candidates, and allow people to make informed judgments on who to send their money to. The net result is to diminish the power of the RNC (and the elites that control it) over the party. If a candidate, detested by the elites for his positions, can secure campaign funding without support from the elites, then that strips the elites of power.

The solution to elite control is to never send money to the RNC. Always send money to individual candidates that you admire. And mention in the letter that you made your decision to send money from what you heard about them on FR

107 posted on 08/05/2007 7:26:55 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Open Season rocks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymLJz3N8ayI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

It was by accident and I had the time of my life.


108 posted on 08/05/2007 7:29:29 AM PDT by Leisler (Just be glad your not getting all the Government you pay for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: SoldierMedic

You:
I viewed their point as a call to engage in real conversation and debate, rather than come up with one line rebuttels that add nothing.”

Cannoneer No. 4:
“The IQ level here has dropped precipitiously since I joined. Lots of highly intelligent, articulate, engaging Freepers don’t come here much any more.”

ME:
Cannoneer spelled precipitously wrong, while telling us how
dim witted we are.
He added nothing to the context of the thread.


109 posted on 08/05/2007 7:31:46 AM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4; Leisler
Leisler: "The next day I went to the voting commissioners office. There was a crowd of the usual Freepers and unwashed multitude and also a brand new white motorhome with some young, male official RNC people. They wouldn’t even come out into the crowd. Bunch of oxford collared lame ass stiffs."

Cannoneer: "Lots of highly intelligent, articulate, engaging Freepers don't come here much any more. They have moved on"

They probably moved on in their brand new white motorhomes.

110 posted on 08/05/2007 7:34:51 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I agree. Since maybe WWI we have had a centralizing, top down trend, under the influence of various elitists and modeled on old, corporations. But as you pointed out the cost drop due to the Internet has weakened the power of centralized gate keepers. So, for any movement, left or right, their gatekeepers have a personal disdain for what is going on. Remember how Dean within the Democrat establisment was disliked and feared with his netroots/Dean meet up approach? Trent Lott, Pelousey, would like to go back to their old pals in the MSM.
111 posted on 08/05/2007 7:35:27 AM PDT by Leisler (Just be glad your not getting all the Government you pay for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

No one comes here anymore, it’s too crowded.


112 posted on 08/05/2007 7:36:45 AM PDT by Leisler (Just be glad your not getting all the Government you pay for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan

Thanks!


113 posted on 08/05/2007 7:39:09 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: philetus; wouldntbprudent; Cannoneer No. 4
I think the point is on the top of your heads..... both of you are trolls.

You are illustrating our points well. Why don't you troll-off and post pithy, one-liners elsewhere, Newbie.

(I know that you won't, I'm just feeding the troll.)

114 posted on 08/05/2007 7:39:16 AM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
That said, PR is dead wrong re: FR and its' impact. It is truly a wonderful site and the modern day equivalent of the townhall meeting where the people could voice their opninion in 2-way dialogs.

But it's not the only game in town any more. There's littlegreenfootballs.com, jihadwatch.com, bellmontclub.com, and many others where I spend time in addition to FR

115 posted on 08/05/2007 7:39:45 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Open Season rocks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymLJz3N8ayI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty

FR hasn’t done some of these things such as swarming because of a conscious decision to behave according to a conservative ethical code.


116 posted on 08/05/2007 7:41:28 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
You’ve touched on a point that some people are missing. FreeRepublic is not a place to come to for marching orders. People gather here, discuss issues and ideas, and as a result of those discussions, are motivated to take action on some of those issues. Jim Robinson is not sitting there cracking the whip, telling the crowd what to do. They talk amongst themselves and then get moving!

Trying to tell Freepers what to do is like the proverbial attempt to herd kittens. But when Freepers reach concensus, they move as one to accomplish the task. And then, leaders arise to assist, like Kristinn and Dr. Raoul!

117 posted on 08/05/2007 7:51:29 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
"It was by accident and I had the time of my life. "

"There are no coincidences." - George Noory

118 posted on 08/05/2007 7:52:45 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
No one comes here anymore, it’s too crowded.

Lol!
Very good!
119 posted on 08/05/2007 7:53:37 AM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty

What a silly article.


120 posted on 08/05/2007 7:54:27 AM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson