Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehrling

Substitute Jews for Mormons and this lot would be permanently banned.


16 posted on 08/04/2007 3:39:38 PM PDT by claudiustg (I prefer the Bill of Rights to Bill O'Reilly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: claudiustg

“Substitute Jews for Mormons and this lot would be permanently banned.”

Jews don’t get agitated when asked questions about the religion. Matter-of-fact, they are happy to talk about it if asked.


27 posted on 08/04/2007 4:06:17 PM PDT by Grunthor (I enjoy holding hands, long walks on the beach and poking dead things with a stick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: claudiustg

“Substitute Jews for Mormons and this lot would be permanently banned.”

That is false and a lie. No one is saying Mitt cannot run for president, or that Mormons are bad neighbors. What is being said is that if Mitt cannot explain his religious underpinnings, the foundation of his moral decision making, then he will likely be chewed up as President.

Lieberman was and is a viable candidate (even on the right who helped his election) BECAUSE he is a real Jew, and can explain his positions. One of the reasons John Kerry failed was because he COULDN’T explain his Catholicism in public. Hillary will be called to account because of her dishwater Methodist beliefs as well.

Truthfully, I think everyone who believes religion has NO place in politics should be banned, don’t you? Wouldn’t that be a de facto way of turning Free Republic into an atheist site? Or is that what you want?


66 posted on 08/04/2007 6:20:44 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson