“I think that before jumping all over Bill we should determine why he thinks this site needs a monitor.”
Is that a joke? LOL
Bill thinks all the internet should be monitored and policed with NEW laws.
“Bill thinks all the internet should be monitored and policed with NEW laws.”
Naive, I am. However, and I don’t dispute your statement, I need a bit more before I can digest this as truth. If true then, for me, it means the end of Bill as a voice of reason.
I have noticed that his arrogance has, on occassion, compromised his capacity to deal fairly with issues.
Having said the above, in what manner, specifically, has Bill proposed to legislate the internet? In other words, what law has he proposed? After all if it is merely his thought that sites should better monitor themselves by using outside monitors or whatever that is all together different than proposing to pass laws to monitor sites.