[piytar]

NOT reasonable. You do NOT shoot a 17 year old kid for this type of thing, PERIOD. We don’t even know if there was any hanky panky going on. Maybe he was hiding because Dad is a nutjob. (Gee, what would make one suspect that?)

All joking aside (and some of it is pretty funny), lifetime paralysis is NOT a justifiable consequence. I don’t think those of you who are tacitly approving this nutjob’s actions know someone facing a lifetime of paralysis. It sucks, something I would not wish on anyone (with a couple jihadist exceptions).

[umgud]

Did I really need a sarcasm tag on my post?

[TheGunny]

We don’t even know if there was any hanky panky going on......Um, ok. What are his just deserts in this case? I am a father of two grown daughters and I can tell you that I absolutely would assume (the perp was in the closet ya know)the worst about what was going on. Its enough to make you...yeah, insane:o)

[Grizzled Bear]

We don’t even know if there was any hanky panky going on.

---

Bwuhahahahaha!!!

[Clam Digger]

Reread the article, you missed something.

[IIntense]

You do NOT shoot a 17 year old kid for this type of thing, PERIOD.

Just want you to know, piytar, that I wholeheartedly agree with you. No question about it...YOU ARE RIGHT!

While these teenagers had no business being in the girl's bedroom, the father's actions were far worse.

Maybe he was hiding because the Dad is a nutjob.

This doesn't excuse those kids, BUT, if the father is found to be a "nutjob", the next thing we'll be reading is that he has plead insanity, maybe on the advice of an attorney.