Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElectricStrawberry

“Something about “Congress shall make no law....” comes to mind.”


Read the article, Congress was not involved in any way.


15 posted on 08/02/2007 9:09:30 AM PDT by ansel12 ((America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

So.....State legislatures are allowed to freely violate Constitutional rights? Constitutional rights can only be violated by the FedGov?
Guvna can suspend habeus corpus all he wants ‘cause he’s not “the feds”? Staties can search you all they want ‘cause they’re not federal marshalls? Texas can establish a state religion because, afterall, they’re not the fedgov? TX can shut down the Houston Chronicle because the Constitution only applies to violations by the fedgov? TX can take away all your firearms ‘cause they’re not the ATF?

You think the Supremes would agree or would the Supremes rule that local governments cannot violate your Constitutional rights either??

As stated, I have no problem with God being in the Pledge or any other pledge, but making it “mandatory by law” just doesn’t fly right.


36 posted on 08/02/2007 11:05:21 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (1/27 Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson