Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jim_trent

Over at

http://www.chicagotribune.com/services/newspaper/premium/printedition/Friday/chi-070803bridgecollapse-htmlpage,0,3347666.htmlpage?coll=chi_news_local_promo

there is a good diagram.

The center span over water is 468’ (if I recall correctly) of the 1900’ total.

The whole bridge was limited to one lane each direction where there is normally four lanes of heavy traffic each direction.


2,507 posted on 08/03/2007 8:30:04 AM PDT by hlmencken3 (Originalist on the the 'general welfare' clause? No? NOT an originalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2502 | View Replies ]


To: hlmencken3
The whole bridge was limited to one lane each direction where there is normally four lanes of heavy traffic each direction.

Has that been confirmed? Even 2 days later i've heard conflicting accounts, 1/2 those saying 2 lanes were open per direction (4 total), and the other half saying only 1 lane per side(2 total). Could it be the reason for the confusion was that while parts of the collapsed section was down to 2 lanes, others were still at 4?

2,509 posted on 08/03/2007 9:10:37 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (sing after me......de-por-ta-tion cha-cha-cha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2507 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson