Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danette

1,674 posted on 08/01/2007 10:22:08 PM PDT by Danette ("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1672 | View Replies ]


To: Danette

1,676 posted on 08/01/2007 10:27:58 PM PDT by Danette ("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1674 | View Replies ]

To: Danette
First picture of 1674 is exactly what I wanted to see.

PERFECT!

The builders allowed for the rapid flow of the river on the North side, but below the lock, that is normally calm water. However, when they drain the lock, the bridge pier would be subjected to scouring.

If this happened, the East side of the bridge pier (down on the first image on 1674, would be on the down flow side and would be the first to drop.

If the down-flow side dropped, it would cause the twisting movement of the bridge towards the East, and cause the North side of the bridge to move West. This is what we see in the images.

1,680 posted on 08/01/2007 10:36:16 PM PDT by Hunble (Islam is God's punishment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1674 | View Replies ]

To: Danette
I’m trying to allow for ambiguity on bridge orientation..

The Mississippi river flows from West to East at this location. The lock is on the South side of the river.

The major portion of the city of Minneapolis is South of the river, if you are using satellite images.

This bridge would be located just North and East of the center of Minneapolis.

1,687 posted on 08/01/2007 10:43:45 PM PDT by Hunble (Islam is God's punishment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1674 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson