Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2

That was a different issue in a sense. The original design wasn’t used and a “modified” design was used to support the two walkways. The modified design was far less structurally sound, though it should be noted the original design wasn’t sound itself - and it wouldn’t have supported that load.


1,479 posted on 08/01/2007 8:28:12 PM PDT by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1461 | View Replies ]


To: flintsilver7

You are absolutely correct. Though, at the time, they tried to say it was the modified design which was inherently weak and caused the collapse. Somehow they didn’t inform the general public that neither design was capable of supporting the load that the structure had to bear that night.

Guess they were trying to minimize lawsuits.


1,523 posted on 08/01/2007 8:46:40 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (It's turtles all the way down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1479 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson