Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mware

Don’t want O’reilly or anyone else defining what is ‘hate’ speech and what is not. The line needs to be drawn at inciting physical violence for which there is already a law. Nah O’rielly is talking about thought police, that is were he is going with this. He took comments out of context and even changed the wording [omitted words in comment] in the examples he used. He is not to be trusted. If he ever starts to actually not spin this and not make false and misleading statements I might start to care he has to say. Till then he is not even in my thought range.

I suspect we will hear a lot more from many in the dying media and the left as they want to control the information they fear. “The People” should not have such power in their view. The net is a threat to their way of controlling things. I like the fact they fear us it goes to show we are gaining in influence in the war of thoughts and values.


541 posted on 08/02/2007 9:35:24 AM PDT by free_life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]


To: free_life
So far O'Reilly has been saved the pain of having to make a profound and deep apology to those of us at FreeRepublic by the collapse of the Minneapolis interstate highway bridge.

Anyone know if it was terrorist related yet?

I think that's pretty much an approximation of an O'Reilly type spin ~ hope he gets the message.

561 posted on 08/02/2007 12:04:21 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson