No, it did not. The examiner could make no definative conclusion. That's what the autopsy report contained.
"Explain this for us. How did she get from asleep in bed to severely injured and nearly dead on the hallway floor after her angry husband came home late on Saturday night?"
I have no desire to explain, or elaborate on pure speculative fantasy.
Dr. Thogmartin was at pains to refute bulimia as a cause. In essence, he made fun of the whole idea, albeit in polite medical language. "Bulimia" wasn't even a medical opinion, but one made up by a trial lawyer named Gary Fox for purposes of a lawsuit.
Suffice to say, that "explanation" is at odds with medical facts and hopeless. Do you have any other guesses?
Aw, give it a try. Just find ANY innocent explanation that accounts for her injuries. It is no fantasy that Terri was grievously injured late that night. See, that's where the whole story starts.
You can't frame a rational opinion on how it ends without at least knowing if Michael hurt Terri that night in 1990. You could be -- and probably are -- covering up for a man who criminally assaulted his wife. It would be a travesty to support the right of a criminal assailant to finish off his victim later, with a court order. Everyone's sense of justice is outraged at the very thought of it.