“I have never ever seen someone post “I hate blacks”.”
Ditto.
Same here and if it WAS posted you can bet a mod would delete it within seconds.
Kristin, ya did a good job!
“I have never ever seen someone post “I hate blacks”.”
Ditto.”
Nor have I, and there’s a proscription against racism in comments.
Somebody has posted the phrase "I Hate Blacks".
It was part of the HEADLINE of an ARTICLE published in "San Francisco Gate.com" (SFGate.com) entitled:
Asian paper's "I Hate Blacks" column assailed
Freepers then went on to blast the author of said newspaper column as "an idiot racist".
It seems that Bill O'Reilly had his "Dan Rather Moment" with "All the News that is Fit to Fake".
Racists would be called out probably before the moderators even saw the post! I loved ORs books, but Man, he can be an a**hat sometimes..
Evidently the folks O'Rielly tasked to find a right-wing analog of the drivel posted on the DailyKOS, did a Google search, and came up with a discussion on FR of an article in sfgate.com condemning an article entitled (drum roll please) "Why I hate blacks" (Published as part of a series, all by the same author including "Why I hate whites" and "Why I hate Asians"--evidently the author is an even-handed jerk, rather than an actual racist, but I digress).
I guess that means www.foxnews.com is a 'Hate site' according to BOR's delicate sensibilities, since the same phrase turns up in a Google search there (discussing the same article.)
While we're at it, the only Google or Yahoo search hit on the phrase "homosexuals are dogs" on FR (as of this morning 11:00 AM CDT) is in a defense of the notion of sovereign immunity as applied to Robert Mugabe, on an occasion when a homosexual activist wanted to arrest him in London because of his (Mugabe's) anti-homosexual rantings.
Likewise there are no Google or Yahoo search hits for the phrase "Hillary should be assassinated".
BOR is either a liar or too trusting of a Dan Rather fake-but-accurate type on his staff.
It's always amusing how the left (just a wild guess that O'Rielly's staffer is a leftist), or people pandering to the left (which is what O'Rielly is doing here) have to resort to using brief quotations taken out of context to impute scurrilous views to the right, while we on the right can conveniently, after the method of R. Emmett Tyrell in the American Spectator and the Swiftboat Veterans for Truth, manage to demolish our opponents by extended direct quotation in context.