As for Dawkins' comment, stating a belief in something which can't be proven does not a religious zealot make.
And again, your attempts to disparage evolution by calling it a "church" or a "religion" (ostensibly to connote a mindlessness in its acceptance) is not only ironic, but pretty d@mned insulting to religious people. I guess the ones on your side are willing to look the other way when being insulted by one of their own. For the greater good and all that.
Not all churches are equal. I put the Church of Darwin right down there with the Church of Scientology.