What I don’t get is folks editorializing with the title of the thread, something certainly not unique to you. Isn’t that what the comments section is for?
I just checked you posting history and found that you have posted to multitudinous threads with parenthetical editorializing, and yet you failed to frown upon this common practice time and again—until me. Very interesting...
GGG: How *DARE* you add a snide remark to the sanctified evolutionary title!
Don’t you know mocking evolution is akin to throwing a Koran in the toliet. Somethings are just too unacceptable and hurtful to the feelings of others... you should be more seeeeeensitive to their feeeeeeeeeeelings.
Like South Park said:
“Our Science is great. [walks away from the table and stands before a wall] Let us not forget the great Richard Dawkins who finally freed the world of religion long ago. [a painting is shown, with Dawkins in it] Dawkins knew that logic and reason were the way of the future. [More of the painting is shown: Mrs. Garrison appears] But it wasn’t until he met his beautiful wife that he learned using logic and reason isn’t enough. You have to be a dick to everyone who doesn’t think like you. [turns around] Prepare all the troops! We will level the United Atheist Alliance to the ground!”
I wouldn't call it editorializing. I would call it misreading. What I can't understand is how someone could be so stupid as to post an article demonstrating their inability to read.