The title of this thread is not the title of the article, and the material added in parentheses flatly contradicts the content of the article.
It just makes FR look like it is run by people who can’t read.
Here’s the link to the article:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070726142013.htm
How exactly did I get the title wrong???
But it also makes this forum a lot more fun than Darwin Central where they stay too serious all the time.
If memory serves, this is the second time you have gone running to the moderators over absolutely nothing. Ever hear of the boy who cried wolf?