Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
I’m not lying. I don’t find the word “church” to be a pejoritive word. I really don’t. But the Darwinists do because they like to pretend that they are not a religion. Am I rubbing their faces in it, you betcha.

You're using it pejoratively. It's there for anyone to see. We also have you presuming to know the mind of all 'Darwinists' and have them all believing that "church" is a bad word, never mind the fact that *millions* of Christians (real ones, mind you, who actually practice the beliefs they hold) are also 'Darwinists' and might take issue with your presumption.

Why don't you let people inform you of their religious affiliation rather than you foisting it upon them? Oh, wait. I know why.

126 posted on 07/31/2007 2:11:41 PM PDT by LibertarianSchmoe ("...yeah, but, that's different!" - mating call of the North American Ten-Toed Hypocrite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianSchmoe
The Darwinist Christians need to know they are affiliated with a cult. And the state-sanctioned Darwinists who are using the ACLU to create a legal monopoly and push ID/Creation Science out of our public Schools already hate the Church. As for all the genuine, non-cult affiliated Christians, not a one of them has objected to me using the word church to refer to religious Darwinism. But I will give you one thing...you have set me to thinking about a new, more accurate word to replace church in the Church of Darwin. But I will have to think it through before I implement it. At any rate, thanks for the inspiration!
127 posted on 07/31/2007 2:24:49 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson