He will probably not receive significant, if any, punishment. His vandalism was:
a) not his fault, because he was drunk,
b) a noble political statement, for which he should be rewarded, not punished,
c) something he cannot be convicted of, because of some kind of government abuse of his rights.
The verdict in Minneapolis would be not guilty due to:
b) a noble political statement, for which he should be rewarded, not punished,
Up here this is just one of the normal means of “political free speech,” as long as the person exercising in such a manner is a member of the DFL or Green Party.