the first seems a lot more plausible than the second (matter of fact everything (from the creation museum) you posted seems a lot more believable than darwinism). (p.s. read the 2nd law of thermodynamics, you really need a good review)
Wow. You don't even know what evolution is. Thanks for the comedy.
You don't even know what thermodynamics is, either, apparently. It's sadly disappointing someone with a supposed B.S. in chemistry doesn't understand a concept as simple as entropy transport across a system boundary. Anyone who passes Physics 101 should know better than to say something silly like "thermodynamics prevents complexity from arising in nature".
btw, stop with the “evolution” nonsense. We all believe in evolution, WHAT WE DON’T BELIEVE IS darwinism, or macroevolution (change from one species into another magically).