Posted on 07/28/2007 12:55:24 PM PDT by doug from upland
Hillary Rodham Clinton is soon going to be under oath in the history civil suit, Paul v Clinton. The California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments on Sept. 7 and determine whether Hillary is brought back into the case as a defendant. In any circumstance, she will be forced to testify. That was made clear in a court hearing last year in the courtroom of Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz.
Yes, I know you are saying that Hillary will simply say, "I can't recall." That's expected, but she is going to be confronted with five hours of home video taken by Peter Paul. There are many things that no one would fail to recall. Not even if they were not the smartest woman in the world.
Background and documents are on HILLCAP DOT ORG
NEWLY RELEASED SMOKING GUN VIDEO
HILLARY SETS UP HER DAUGHTER FOR PERJURY
CLINTON ROLE IN THE COLLAPSE OF STAN LEE MEDIA
RECALLING THE EIGHT YEAR NIGHTMARE OF THE CLINTON YEARS
We need your help. I will go on any talk show at any hour, day or night. Please help get info to newsrooms. Would a FReeper artist like to design a logo for TRUTH BOATING HILLARY?
Is Fort Marcy Park still open to the public?
L
Under oath!!! Unfortunately that doesn't mean a "tinkers damn" to the Clintons.
If her lips are moving you know she's lying.
It will never see the light of day if people sit on their *sses and simply whine that it will not see the light of day. Sorry to be so abrupt, but are you going to whine or are you going to help? I would prefer the help and would be grateful if you can give it. Thanks.
In her declaration, Hillary swore that she met Peter Paul in 2000. Do you think she would forget meeting him in 1993 as he had Fabio chase her around the room, pick her up, and get photographed in a famous romance pose? Would she not remember that? The documentation and the five hours of home video are going to make the difference. You can’t simply pretend not to recall.
Is it at all possible that the Butch will not serve out her term?
Blend in the trouble that President-to-be Spitzer has recently created...
This NY Freeper is off to DQ for a cold one in celebration.
What trouble?
If they are successful at breaking the MSM silence, this thing will develop legs quickly. I watched the video. Who had this in their possession and why so long for its release?
http://www.buffalonews.com/home/story/128843.html
Spitzer aides may face special investigator in smear probe
Questions persist on what Spitzer knew of campaign by aides
By Tom Precious - NEWS ALBANY BUREAU
Updated: 07/28/07 9:16 AM
ALBANY A state commission with broad powers is weighing whether to appoint a special investigator and launch a full-scale probe into the Spitzer administrations campaign to discredit a political rival.
The State Commission of Investigation, which has extensive authority to investigate any matter concerning the public peace, public safety and public justice, will contact Paul J. Curran, a former U.S. attorney who once investigated President Jimmy Carter, to determine whether he would be interested in leading a probe, a state official told The Buffalo News on Friday.
....
New Yorkers, meanwhile, have expressed skepticism of Spitzer over the matter.
Sixty-two percent of registered voters say they believe additional inquiries are justified, while 50 percent say the governor was aware that his close advisers were trying to smear Bruno, a WNBC-Marist College poll found Friday.
Even within the governors party, 45 percent of Democrats say they dont believe Spitzers denials that he was unaware of his aides activities. And 80 percent of all voters say Spitzer should be required to testify about wrongdoing by his administration.
...
[more]
Peter believes that a low level aide in that office made a mistake by acknowledging that they had that film. When they sent Peter a shipment, it did not include that video. Unfortunately for them, they acknowledged possession of it, and Peter's attorney really leaned on them to provide it. It finally came a few weeks after the first shipment of materials.
What is particularly important, in addition to Hillary clearly showing participation and solicitation, is that this tape was withheld while official investigations were proceeding. The FEC was never shown this and the jury in the David Rosen trial was never shown it. Hillary had been cleared by the FEC while important evidence was withheld.
The Clintons have their true believers in every part of government. I believe that whoever was protecting Hillary at the DOJ blew it by releasing the tape to Peter. Hillary must have either forgotten about it or thought it would be hidden forever or destroyed.
Who is the lawyer taking this on? Someone who will be tough, I hope?
Just viewed your videos Doug. Great work! Sending links to all my FRiends, friends, colleagues and family.
Thanks for your help!
Too bad HH was distracted Friday with the youtube stuff, however I was encouraged that he said he would look into it. HH can articulate it once he understands it.
Have you tried getting on with David Gold on KSFO, he’s on air right now. David is a Freeper (but doesn’t post much) so he must be aware of the effort you’re going through.
Monica Crowley is another that can articulate a situation very good and she would love to go after the beast.
Just my 2c.
I suspect that Hillary and her operatives will be striking hard at silencing such enemies of the state as Fox News and the blogosphere (us), in order to contain this; and that Hillary's repressionist agents in the "news" media will work quickly to break (figuratively?) any lasting "legs".
*********************
BTW - - Doug, you da Man!
Sent him a writing sample (chapter 5 of my book). Do you want to see it, too? If so, pls FReepmail me your e-addy.
The trick on this, you know, is to have a publisher lined up and ready to go. My publisher won't touch it, believe me. Thanks, mate!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.