That's wrong. I'm arguing with you over your support for the LEO's actions, and your less than stellar defense of the Second Amendment.
You do understand that I had NOTHING to do with their arrest, right?
Of Course. My tagline suggestion was because of your Kerryesque hedge on the RKBA with respect to NOPD gun confiscation.
You obviously want me to say that it's my fault a law isn't up to your expectations, and I'm not going to do it.
Again, I have no idea where you get that. AFAIK, you are not a legislator, so I don't blame you for the law, nor the LEO's enforcement of same. (Sheesh, is there a full moon tonight?)
If you have a beef about this incident, you should call the police department, (records dept) and ask them about his arrest and what charges they have filed against them.
No need, it's in the article:
"they were charged with two counts of assaulting a government official, and one count each of resisting arrest and desecrating an American flag."
Hmmm... no charges of fleeing, or failure to produce ID is mentioned...
Yes, I do [still stand behind the declaration that he was within his right to enter their house and arrest them at that time], because he had the law on his side!
You said you didn't know whether they were suspected of a felony, but you still support a warrantless entry. Is it your opinion that warrantless entries are constitutional in the investigation of a misdemeanor?
Don’t bother arguing with the statists on here, it’ll just give you a headache.
I don’t think the officer should have forced his way into their castle (Home).